Public Sector Insurers Evaluate Modifications to In-House Health TPA Strategies

With a keen eye on enhancing efficiency and improving customer service, public sector insurance companies are currently reviewing their strategies related to captive health Third Party Administrators (TPAs). The primary aim is to streamline the process of health insurance claims, while also working to mitigate losses in their health insurance portfolios.

Origins of HITPA

The Health Insurance TPA (HITPA) was established in the capital city of India, Delhi, in 2013. The creation of HITPA was motivated by two central objectives. First, to improve the customer experience, and second, to increase the efficiency of health insurance claims processing for Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).

Focussing on Customer Experience

One of the key objectives of HITPA has been to elevate the customer experience. The insurance sector, especially the health insurance domain, is customer-centric. Ensuring that policyholders have a positive experience is a critical aspect of building long-term customer relationships and fostering loyalty.

Efficiency in Claims Processing

Another primary goal for HITPA has been to enhance the efficiency of health insurance claims processing. This involves streamlining procedures, reducing administrative bottlenecks, and ensuring timely disbursement of claims. Efficient claims processing is not only beneficial to the policyholders but also plays a crucial role in the effective management of an insurance company.

Role of TPAs in Health Insurance

TPAs play a vital role in the health insurance sector. They act as an intermediary between insurance providers and policyholders, handling the administrative tasks involved in claim processing. By taking over these responsibilities, TPAs allow insurance companies to focus on their core competencies.

PSUs and Health Insurance Claims

For PSUs, managing health insurance claims can be a complex and time-consuming task. Given their large customer base, the volume of claims can be substantial. Consequently, efficient claims management is a priority for these public sector insurers.

Benefits of In-House TPAs

Having an in-house TPA, like HITPA, offers several benefits to PSUs. It provides better control over the claims process, enables faster response times, and allows for more customized service delivery. Moreover, it can lead to cost savings as it eliminates the need for outsourcing these services.

Reducing Losses in Health Insurance Portfolios

An ancillary advantage of increasing efficiency in claims processing is the potential to reduce losses in health insurance portfolios. The ‘bleeding’ in these portfolios refers to the losses incurred due to inefficient management, unnecessary delays, and fraudulent claims.

Review of Current Strategies

Despite the potential benefits, PSUs are reviewing their current strategies related to captive health TPAs. This review is being driven by a need to further enhance efficiency, improve customer service, and reduce losses.

Aiming for Improvement

The review process indicates the PSU insurers’ commitment to continuous improvement. They are not content to rest on their laurels but are instead focused on finding ways to better serve their customers and manage their operations more effectively.

Impact on Policyholders

Any changes in the strategies of PSU insurers will have a direct impact on policyholders. Improved efficiency in claims processing can lead to faster disbursement of claims, while enhanced customer service can result in a more positive insurance experience.

Impact on the Insurance Sector

These changes also have implications for the broader insurance sector. As PSUs streamline their operations and enhance customer service, other players in the sector may be forced to follow suit to remain competitive.

Future of TPAs

The ongoing review of strategies related to captive health TPAs points to their evolving role in the insurance sector. As insurers continue to seek ways to enhance efficiency and customer service, the importance of TPAs in the insurance ecosystem is likely to grow.


In conclusion, the review of captive health TPA strategies by PSU insurers is an important development in the insurance sector. It underscores the ongoing efforts to improve customer service and operational efficiency, while also highlighting the challenges of managing health insurance claims. As these strategies continue to evolve, they will shape the future of health insurance in the country.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *